I lean slightly towards going for it, but I don’t have strong feelings here – my numbers tell me that either going for it or punting could be the best play. Specifically, punting would be the right call if you think the Bears’ chances of converting on fourth down are less than 32 percent. (Based on my analysis, I’d give the Bears a 33 percent chance to get a first down here.)
Here's the full breakdown of my calculations:
Option  Chance of converting 
Chance of winning
Before play

After play  Change  

Go for it4th and 9, own 26  33%  5%  5%    
Punt  5%  5%    
Field goal tryA really, really long kick  <1%  5%  3%  –2% 
Along with some circuitry to come up with a win probability for every game situation, all you need to figure out what you should do next is an estimate of how likely you are to make a field goal or convert a first down.
My estimates for these are based on the results of thousands of similar plays, but you may think you're smarter than I am. This chart shows you how changing those estimates would change my recommendation.
Punt  97% of the time 
Go for it  3% of the time 
Field goal try   
Patrick O'Donnell punts for 48 yards to GB26. Patrick O'Donnell punts for 48 yards to GB26.
To estimate a team’s chances of winning, I use a mathematical model that accounts for a whole lot of variables — including the difference in score, the time remaining in the game, and the number of timeouts each team has left. On top of that, I have models for the likelihood that a team makes a field goal and the likelihood that it will convert a first down.
By combining all of this information, I can come up with the best decision a team can make, according to math.
If you want even more details about the numbers behind my decisions, my full model is available on GitHub. Help make me better!